Editor's Notes
The view from here
ITV hires new factual controller
Lion Television brings twist to property factual
New VP of Production at A. Smith
Jon & Kate Plus 8 scores big with wedding
Leopard UK & USA add heads of production
Off the Fence produces two shark films for Nat Geo Int
Whale Wars gets top ratings for Animal Planet
AETN finalizes deals with German broadcasters
Oscar's shortlisted docs announced
Reel Asian Film Fest announces winners
No Religulous nomination? Blasphemy
Hip-hop doc explores misogyny of the genre
Activist blogger attempts to boycott Sundance
Salon's O'Hehir sees same old docu-Oscar problem
Indie Films on Amazon
NY Times reports on risky Turkish doc
In-depth talk of upcoming Obama doc
NBA star pitches Darfur doc
Exclusive Remembrance Day film on NFB site
UK audience numbers growingOur take on current and past film and TV projects
Industry experts offer their take
| by: | Jan 1, 2006 |
The rising cost of clearing copyrighted material was a hot topic throughout 2005, with the debate hitting a fever pitch after Eyes on the Prize had trouble renegotiating expired archive licenses. Discussions produced an important milestone in November, when the "Documentary Filmmakers Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use" was released by the Center for Social Media and endorsed by key groups in the industry, including the International Documentary Association, IFP and POV/American Documentary.
The statement makes clear what the industry considers reasonable conditions for fair use. The fair use doctrine allows copyrighted material to be used without a license, but is under used by the industry because gatekeepers and insurance companies often insist all rights be cleared, just to be safe. Since one condition for determining fair use is professional expectations, the statement creates a powerful guideline. For specifics, visit
www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fairuse.htm
Privacy
About realscreen
Advertising
Feedback