Editor's Notes
The view from here
Jonathan Levi named ITV Studios' head of arts and popular culture
Allan King events celebrate filmmaker at TIFF
Outright announces deals in South Africa, Israel
BBC Four commissions three arts series from Tern TV
ITV and Pulse ink global distribution deal for "Showbusiness"
Armoza Formats' "The Bubble" pops up in Lithuania
Babyfoot signs first look with ITV Studios
Crusty Demons come to TV with new series
"Real Housewives of New Jersey" reunion racks up big numbers for Bravo
Trinny and Susannah makeover The Netherlands and Australia
TV survey reveals Brits prefer docs
BET changes perception of NASCAR with new docu-series
Real-life drama in reality TV
Shearer's "Big Uneasy" hits theaters for one night only
'X-Factor' Auto-tune controversy a sign of how far show has come
Spike Lee talks HBO doc ahead of its premiere
Seven moves to three channels with male network 7mate
Online platforms put power in DIY filmmakers' hands
Hulu pursues an IPO
NPR blogger hypothesizes best DVD releases tend to be docsThe view from here
Random musings on the non-fiction biz
Our take on current and past film and TV projects
Industry experts offer their take
| by: | Oct 1, 2005 |
Scientists may toil in the hallowed halls of academia, but finding the brilliant heads that help strengthen a show sometimes requires grass roots tactics. This is precisely the approach producer Rich Blundell took for a 30-minute pilot called Science Out There (w/t).
Coproduced by Boston-based Chedd-Angier Production (Scientific American Frontiers) and Blundell's Maine-based Omniscopic Productions, the show shadows three scientists as they conduct research in their respective fields. One is a marine biologist who studies gulls, another an expert in ancient technologies who explores the use of handmade yucca rope to access cliff dwellings, and the third is a bat biologist who searches for the furry, misunderstood creatures in abandoned mines.
To find these experts, Blundell designed and conducted a broad recruitment strategy that included a website where experts could register to be added to a database. With the aid of a US$50,000 planning grant from the National Science Foundation, Blundell widened his hunt for potential on-camera experts using Internet research, scientific journals and query letters in which he asked specialists about their studies - those amenable to appearing in the show made it into Blundell's database. He furthered his recruitment by posting flyers at universities and attending science-focused gatherings, where he included a brochure about his website in the literature distributed to attendees.
After gathering a list of about 150 scientists from around the world, Blundell followed up with the roughly one third that looked most promising, then narrowed that number down to three, all of whom were in the U.S. because of budget limitations. The New Mexico-based ancient technologies expert was located via a National Geographic article, while the other two scientists "were much more under the radar and hadn't written anything for the public," says Blundell. He found them through Web searches and recommendations. "Ninety-nine percent of the time it's someone's colleagues throwing recommendations that really pays off," he says. For instance, when Blundell found the marine lab off the coast of Maine where his featured gull biologist works, the lab's pr woman said, "I know exactly who you should use. She's fun, she's vibrant - you'll love her." The recommendation was bang on, reports Blundell.
The personality of the experts was key for Blundell, who acts as host of the show. They needed to be charismatic, passionate about their work, and people with whom he had good chemistry on camera. Since his target is the 18- to 35-year-old demo, he also wanted them to be fun, "because the whole point of this show is to shed a fun light on science and to inspire young people to pursue science as a career." Although the experts aren't paid for their involvement, the respect they earn with audiences may be reward enough.
Privacy
About realscreen
Advertising
Feedback